South Park 911Truth.Org Murders
Just downloaded and watched the South Park episode, Mystery of the Urinal Deuce.While the story seems to be a expose on the state of the 911 "truth" movement and the cover up. It ends with...
"all 911 conspiracy websites are run by the government"..."people need to think we are all powerful, that we control the world, if they know we weren't in charge of 911 then we appear to control nothing."
Didn't anybody find it odd that characters making those statements were also the ones who graphically murdered the two 911Truth.Org characters?
Was this a not so subtle reference to Michael Zebuhr's murder?
posted by War On Suckers at 10:36 PM
10 Comments:
No. Nobody found it odd. Trey Parker and Matt Stone were taking the piss out of the paranoid conspiracy freaks out there. You didn't pick up on it because you lack critical thinking skills. Once again, if you have such compelling evidence for any of your claims, what's stopping you from taking your 'evidence' to the proper authorities? Or are you willingly obstructing justice?
Who are the "proper authorities"?
By the way isn't that one of sub texts in this South Park episode? Perhaps a figure like Jim Garrison would be a "proper authority"?
We now have secret police running around in black uniforms, ski masks, full body amour and automatic weapons to protect us from some vague enemy that could attack us at anytime because they "hate our freedoms". Who are the "paranoid conspiracy freaks" that believe that crap?
Earth to Tinfoil Hatter: South Park is a cartoon. There are no crab people.
Once again, this does not answer my question. Evasion noted. As for the 'proper authorities', I'm sure there would many people in your Goverment (and Internationally), when presented with irrefuteable proof would act on said evidence. But here's your problem...
Conjecture is not evidence
Wild speculation is not evidence
Cherry-Picked quotes are not evidence
Got anything solid? If you were a prosecutor in a court of law with such flimsy, circumstantial evidence, the defendent would fucking walk.
Much of this blog is dedicated to exposing contradictions not just in the official conspiracy theory regarding 19 Arab hijackers but also in many of the alternative theories. However this particular post is just commenting on an example of one form of propaganda.
If you want examples of flaws in the official conspiracy theory regarding the events of 9/11 then here are 2 good places to start.
Three buildings fell faster than physically possible even if one were to ignore structural integrity and only take into account gravity with conservation of momentum.
Then you have all the "no plane" evidence which is pretty well covered over at Killtown's blog
All the information examined here is public domain and well within the reach of anyone who cares to take the time to look and examine it.
Don't worry the Nanny State really only wants to protect you from yourself. Move along, move along, there is nothing to see here.
You actually believe that 'no plane' shit? No wonder even the tinfoil hatters like Dylan Avery thought you were too batshit crazy to associate with.
But you're right. There is nothing to see here. If you had any actual evidence, you wouldn't be whining on a blog.
If, by 'inside job', you mean that the hijackers went inside the planes, hijacked them and flew them into their targets then yes, I guess you could say it was an inside job.
But none of this is an answer to my question. If you have such irrefuteable evidence, why do you not present it to the proper authorities?
Well if you're wanting someone to parrot "911 was an inside job", you've come to the wrong place.
If you're not interested in looking at any details for yourself then you're probably better off coming up with good reasons why alcohol is taxed and legal, while your dole mothers are not. It might be consoling for you when the "proper authorities" find your stash and you find you're someone's bitch.
Evasion duly noted. You still have not answered my question. You've only fogged me off - on killtown's cluster-fuck of a blog - by saying "The authorities didn't want to listen to us... waah waah!!"
Whether you want to admit it or not, all you CTers have an acerbic, confrontational approach, when it comes to trying to present evidence or ask questions. Did you ever think that there's a logical explanation why nobody will give you or Dylan Avery the time of day? Maybe it's not because they're part of a conspiracy... maybe they all think you guys are total dick-pumps trying to profit from the death of a tragedy?
Any further attempts at changing the subject (by way of referring to 'Dole Mothers' or anything else) will be summarily dismissed. Please answer my question? Why have you not presented your 'evidence' to the proper authorities?
If you weren't such a lazy DM you wouldn't be bleating on and on about the "proper authorities" "proper authorities". There have been plenty of attempts to bring evidence to the "proper authorities" over the past 5 years and they've all been ignored, deflected or sidelined. That is not what this blog is about and it certainly isn't about spoon feeding lazy DMs.
Ad hominem attacks duly noted and dismissed. If your 'evidence' has been dismissed by authorities and thoroughly debunked by experts in their respective fields, shouldn't alarm bells be going off in your head? What would it take to convince you that you were wrong? For me, I saw any kind of tangible evidence, that might be a start, but alas...
If you're going to tell me that nothing could convince you that you were wrong, why should I believe you about anything? Such a statement would show that you're incapable of critical thinking and basic logic.
Just for shits and giggles, have a look at the arguments and tactics that Creationists and Holocaust Deniers use. You'll find a hell of a lot of overlap. I'm not trying to lump you with Creationists and Holocaust Deniers (shit, you might be, for all I know), but the tactics of the 9/11 CTers are damn near the same.
Also, if you guys are the ones really looking for the truth, how come you haven't - throughout the movement - even agreed on a single, cohesive explanation?
Hellbound Smoker you sound like your were recruited as an agent provokator. Keep up the good work. Are you paid well?
Post a Comment
<< Home