Evidence No Planes Hit WTC

NO LIVE BROADCAST OF A PLANE HITTING THE WTC
It is interesting to note that in spite of the fact that cameras from every US media corporation were on the scene for the second event at the WTC, there appears to have been NO LIVE BROADCAST of the alleged second impact.
The only feed being broadcast on every network was coming from the WABC helicopter and in fact only shows a silhouette of a plane disappear behind the North tower and a fire ball appear at the other side. All the alleged "impact" videos came later. That certainly would allow time for these to be manufactured using 3D modeling of an aircraft superimposed on real footage of the explosions.

There is a CNN interview by Dave Summers with Carol Hudson who claims to have been on an American Airlines commuter flight from New York to Cleveland that flew very close to the WTC and witnessed the first impact. "It was right outside my window and I'll never forget it." Is the plane seen on the Naudet's fake video? Was that a fake news item to discredit any real witnesses who saw a light plane fly very near the WTC but not hit it? The first news reports were that a light plane flew into the North tower. The official story was established within minutes that a plane had flown into the North tower and this story was reinforced 15mins later as most people watched what they believed to be live video of a second plane flying into the WTC. One archive source of the live broadcasts from Fox and CNN can be downloaded at archive.org (thanks to PerpetualYnquisitive for that link)

By the time clearer video of the alleged events became available it was to follow the "shock and awe" of people jumping (or being thrown) out of the towers and the towers themselves disappearing into a cloud of dust with people inside. No doubt calculated to be sufficient trauma to erase any lingering questions anyone may have had over whether or not planes really hit the towers. It had to be true because now the towers were gone!

Building debri blown outwards from impact points Looking at the images from the first few seconds after the alleged impacts it is clear that the building exteria has been blown out and raining down from not only the alleged exit points but also the entrance. The planes are supposed to have had so much momentum that the ripped straight the steel exterior and even out the otherside. With conservation of momentum the impact debri should be blown inward not outward. 911 was also a tragic day for the laws of physics. This image is from the Naudet video of the North Tower.

The same type of build debri can be seen raining from the South towers alleged impact point in CNN's DVD, America Remembers.

It would be crazy to fly planes into buildings wired with high explosives That would risk blowing everything (no pun intended). Even if the impact didn't prematurely detonate any demolition charges, it would cause unpredictable structural damage and risk disabling an unknown number of preset charges, making a "controlled" demolition impossible. There also seems to have been a plan to trap the occupants of the upper floors as no effort was made to rescue anyone from the roof. The upper floors were occupied by banking and financial institutions. If some of these people were being targeted, flying planes into the towers would have been too unpredictable for the criminal gang. And if they really did have rogue aircraft flying around then there is every likelyhood they'd have been located, intercepted and shot down by the airforce. Now if there are no planes, there is nothing see on radars, nothing to intercept and almost nothing to go wrong.

Well almost nothing to go wrong. With so many camera angles to deal with from different sources, there is always a chance that the techs involved in overlaying the plane image might slip up, get the plane on the wrong approach angle or overshoot. Seems that may be what has happened. A collection of possible blunders are highlighted on this 911tvfakery.net video