Tuesday, July 11, 2006

James Fetzer, Al Gore, Enron and the Global Warming Scam

It just goes from bad to worse! I can't believe a University Professor would be promoting this crap! Global warming? Just finished listening to James Fetzer's July 6 radio show.

Where do I start?

Lets start with the "Green House Gases".

Question: What is the moler mass of oxygen?
Well we can look that up on the periodic table and follow the link for oxygen.
Answer: 15.9994 g/mol. In its common form two atoms are bonded together so thats 31.9988 g/mol

Question: What is the moler mass of CO2?
Answer: Molar mass is 44.0095(14) g/mol

Question: If CO2 is heavier than O2 how is the CO2 supposed to float above the O2?
Answer: Shutup and just pay your carbon tax!

It is true we are poluting and poisoning the planet and we may soon be in danger of choking to death, starving to death or both, but certainly not drowning in rising sea water.

And what about those ice caps that are supposed to be melting? Well they're not. The Antartic ice cap is getting thicker and given that temperatures in winter get down to -70c. It is hard to imagine any ice melting other than Al Gores martini. The reason why it is so cold at the poles is becuase the layer of atmosphere is so thin there due to the rotation of the Earth as well as pull be the sun and moon. The atmosphere at the poles is just 5 miles thick, just 5 miles to the ingredible cold of space, while at the equator its 15 miles thick.

I want to be a supporter of Professor Fetzer but his last radio show with William Deagle was nonsense! Reminds me of how Webster Tarpley was telling his listeners to stock up on Tamiflu!

Fetzer and Deagle mp3-1
Fetzer and Deagle mp3-2

Here's some good reading on the Global Warming hoax.
The Nonsense That Is Global Warming
The Kyoto Protocol – What every NZer should know

Some quotes from Ken Ring
"The voices of the many diligent scientists calling for real hard evidence are drowned out by those who have the ear of a worldwide media hungry for sensational and emotive headlines."

"Fear is bankable. If a population can be convinced that global warming is occurring, there is money to be made. What started off as a small group now has thousands of employees drawing wages."


Blogger PerpetualYnquisitive said...

FOX News also announced mere seconds after the second 'impact', "some of the key suspects that come to mind, Osama bin Laden,... who knows, who knows what."

That can be found on the 9/11 Chronology Split Screen footage @ 14:05. Download the footage here http://www.archive.org/details/911-Chronology-Source


This footage also disproves the claim of the Official Fairy Tale that "Millions saw the second impact live on television."

Tuesday, July 11, 2006 5:10:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Inspired perhaps by long stay in the Dry Tortugas , 'shaken not stirred' was Ian Fleming's idea for iced Dry Martinis. Others castaway from the Poles such as Gore, Fox, and, in the first reports, arch desert rat OBL may all have been schooled in Fleming's precise formula which Robinson Carusoe only thought can be found by chance in a passing bottle.

Thursday, July 13, 2006 2:18:00 AM  
Blogger War On Suckers said...

Thanks for the link to 9/11 Chronology files PI! Unfortunately I'm on a slow connection but from what I've seen of it so far, this is a very useful compilation.

Friday, July 14, 2006 5:35:00 AM  
Blogger War On Suckers said...


What can I say? Wow!

So Fox and CNN were both running the same "live" feed from WABC (ABC's New York news office) at the time of the second impact. So it would seem likely that ABC was also only broadcasting the WABC feed. I wonder what the only other major propaganda outfit was broadcasting live? The WABC feed perhaps?

Very interesting that the WABC footage doesn't actually show the alleged second plane impact. Instead the plane disappears behind the North tower and we see a fireball. Could the reality be a fly by and explosives. All footage showing the alleged impact, including pod and flash came later in the day.

I recall reading stories of witnesses seeing a plane fly nearby the towers at the time of impact. Even stories from passengers who are supposed to have been on the other plane and saw the impact. Could the pod/flash contriversies and stories from witnesses in the other plane, be there to support the official story that planes hit the towers when in fact the plane(s) involved were to only help create an illusion? Afterall the only plane debri shown soon after the second impact materializes under scafolding on "spook" street. The other debri magically materializes the next day for the cameras.

No planes and no blue screens, just good old fashioned techniques in illusion and propaganda? Seems quite likely!

Thursday, September 14, 2006 6:23:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home