Sunday, December 04, 2005

Democracy Underground Moderator Bans WarOnSuckers Reference

Apparently "This blog cites and exhalts quite a few sites well-known for their bigoted and biased agendas. Please do not use in the future.
9/11 Forum Moderator"

Now there's 3 minutes of fame! I wonder how many other so called 9/11 forums will ban references to WarOnSuckers?

Wish Lithos could have been more precise and listed exactly which sites WarOnSuckers "exhalts" that have "bigoted and biased agendas". A few means 3 or more, so quite a few must mean at least 4 or more. Well lets figure it out then. Its rather a short blog so far, so the list of exalted sites is also short.

Well we can scrub from the list of possible offenders as Lyndon LaRouche sings from the same song sheet as Democratic Underground.

I suggest to check the sites on the list and post your considered opinions in the comments area.



Anonymous Rosalee Grable said...

You might as well link to from now on too, you're under the same blacklisting, and can expect the same slurs against you that I have faced for four years and counting.

I used to think that the second hit "plane" had been holographically projected, but that's when I believed the myth of "thousands of witnesses."
Zero witness reports have stood up, and the "planes" turned out to be CGI. The Ghostplane footage is even credited to Scott Myer, a graphic artist at NIST. shows a commercially-available flight simulator animation of the scene.
The more esoteric software that Scott Myers uses (and made a review of) could easily stick a plane into planeless footage to hide a missile strike.

Congratulations again for biting off some real truth and chewing it!

Sunday, December 04, 2005 1:05:00 PM  
Blogger War On Suckers said...

In the case of the event at the North tower. There is no firm evidence anything hit that tower at all and much evidence that flight AA11 didn't even fly that day. The so called videos of whatever happened at the North tower are likely to be pure fabrications. At least one is from a film crew who have clearly manufactured some of their footage. However the situation is quite different for the event at the South tower. The BTS did list UA175 as a scheduled flight along with its taxi and wheel off times. Also there are numorous videos of the impact from independent sources (both corporate and private) that all appear to confirm that horrible event happened as advertised, even including the allonymous flash. Given that the payoff for some of the participants was the insurance scam, it only makes sense that at least one plane had to be publicly destroyed. Losing one and collecting the insurance on four rivals the good fortune of Larry Silverstein and co.

Having said that, I do think the tireless analysis of video over at has been an invaluable contribution to figuring out what the hell happened that day.

Thank you Rosalee for taking the time to read my little blog.

Monday, December 05, 2005 4:12:00 AM  
Anonymous Rosalee Grable said...

Heh. Thanks back at ya.

I am not at all worried what the riffraff thinks, but that you are still laboring under the delusion that the second "plane" was real distresses me.

We were shown cartoons that day.
Animations. The Ghostplane footage turns out to be animated against a still. The smoke isn't moving properly and what ought to be a lick of fire lasting a frame or two is persistant throughout the sequence.

The wing disappears behind a building that should be in the background, and not in front of wings.

Just because the plane existed does not mean it hit that building, melting like butter on a griddle, exploding on the other side of the building first.

I hope you are not beyond rational consideration on this.
I hope you believe in the law of perspective, that objects appear larger when they are closer and smaller when farther away.

The Krash Kartoon
and Jetcrash sequence

both have a "god's eye view" in that they maintain the same visual size throughout their journey, impossible in a 3D world where close things look bigger than far things always and to everybody.

Anyway, I hope you'll answer back and I can answer whatever objections you may have.

The wargames and terror drills gave ample excuse for making visual aids in advance which could be used as an overlay on planeless footage of a missile strike.

Tuesday, December 06, 2005 2:37:00 AM  
Blogger Spooked said...

DemocraticUndergroundcom does not like sites linked to "Holocaust deniers"--on your list, that would be Kaminski and Serendipity, at minimum.

Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thats an interesting tar brush. I've never read anything from Kaminski or on Serendipity suggesting they are "Holocaust deniers". Anti-Zionism maybe, which is quite a different thing!

Tuesday, December 27, 2005 3:31:00 PM  
Blogger War On Suckers said...

Well OK I agree I'm a bit late to the party but better late than never!

Now that I've had a chance to examine some examples of the original live broadcasts its pretty damn obvious that the only "live" broadcast of the 2nd alleged WTC plane impact was a fake coming from the WABC helicopter.

Monday, October 02, 2006 9:04:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home