Sunday, November 06, 2005

Were the Naudet brothers 911 insiders?

A very good article on serendipity.li by Leslie Raphael, examines the amazing coincidence that Juels Naudet just happened to be at the perfect location to film the impact of the North tower on 9-11. Perfect location if you were trying to make a believable propaganda movie, that is.

"Jules Naudet makes filming the plane, a moving subject, look just as easy as filming the burning tower, a stationary one: simplicity itself. In reality, what could be harder than capturing an unexpected and unrepeatable scene of a jet flying at 1,200 feet for two seconds at 450 miles an hour, from a ground level street in New York, the city of skyscrapers? How could such a film be shown many thousands of times, all around the world, without attracting the suspicion it deserves? Because — and the people behind it were doubtless relying on this — to most people who see it, the idea that the film was staged by their own government would be literally unthinkable: it would not even occur to them. Even those prepared to think the unthinkable — to believe the 9/11 attacks themselves were an "inside job" — might not realise the film was part of it, set up by the same people. How could documentary film of one of the attacks, shot by someone with no apparent link to the government, be suspect? Would they be stupid enough to use someone linked to them? The film's uniqueness demands an explanation that fits logic and objectivity, and if luck fails that test, which it does, we have to admit alternatives, however disturbing."

One aspect of the Naudet film that is not covered in the above article is the question, was the impact filmed at all? It certainly looks very different from the second impact, for which there are a large number of diffent video sources. Given they had about 24 hours after the event to fake that "ghost" plane, dub in a sound track (holy shit!...), overlay an explosion and then apend real footage of the burning tower. Maybe the reason there were so few people around that busy intersection at 8:46 on a Tuesday morning is because it was Sunday morning when the street scene was filmed.

Here is one example of the creative licence used in the Naudet documentary. From the documentary voice over "Jules was riding with the Battalion Chief, Joseph Pfeifer, videotaping".
Jules is supposed to be the only one with a camera and yet a few seconds later there is a scene showing their vehicle, en route, from the front. Multiple cameras? Kind of reminisent of the mulitple light source issue on the moon propaganda footage.

Then a few moments later we have the establishing shot to clinch this propa-drama.

This would not be the first time a propaganda clip has been passed off as a chance filming of a tragic event. The Zapruder Film Hoax, created almost 40 years earlier, is a good example of this craft.

And what of the alleged Czech tourist, Pavel Hlava, who is supposed to have also accidentally caught the event on video. This was shown for the first time on abc news in 2003, to the kickoff the 2nd anniversary propaganda campaign. Although it was said to have been filmed out the window of an SUV, curiously the camera position appears to be much higher than that of a SUV window and a firetruck appears to be reflected in the back window of the vehicle in front. Where exactly was Gedeon Naudet that morning? On the back of a firetruck riding through the Brookland tunel?

The Naudet video certainly appears to have been made with prior knowledge and the Havel Hlava video seems to have been made by the same team. Just two alternative angles on the same event. Either would have fitted the Naudet firehouse propa-drama storyline but only one was needed, the other likely stashed away for possible later use.

It is not conclusive though that either video really show the alleged aircraft impact. Given both are propaganda clips and most likely made by the the same team, there was no need for a real plane impact to be captured on film at all, when you could more easily fake it. Perhaps one reason for the 24 hour delay before broadcasting the Naudet clip, was to eliminate the risk of conflicting amature video of what really happened. Also perhaps more attention should be paid to reports that morning of missles fired from the Woolworths building at the towers.

10 Comments:

Blogger 'Thought & Humor' said...

You have a riveting web log
and undoubtedly must have
atypical & quiescent potential
for your intended readership.
May I suggest that you do
everything in your power to
honor your encyclopedic/omniscient
Designer/Architect as well
as your revering audience.
As soon as we acknowledge
this Supreme Designer/Architect,
Who has erected the beauteous
fabric of the universe, our minds
must necessarily be ravished with
wonder at this infinite goodness,
wisdom and power.

Please remember to never
restrict anyone's opportunities
for ascertaining uninterrupted
existence for their quintessence.

Best wishes for continued ascendancy,
Dr. Howdy

'Thought & Humor'

Monday, November 07, 2005 9:57:00 PM  
Blogger Ringwind said...

Google: "Arrest Bush 41"

Wednesday, November 30, 2005 4:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Rosalee Grable said...

Right when I began to think there is no intelligent life left on this planet, I discovered your blog.
You do a much better job of explaining my work than I do.

Here's a pretty comprehensive analysis of the Woolworth building's possible involvement:
http://orbwar.com/woolworth/

Maybe you can explain the Plane-free first hit better than I can too.
http://missilegate.com


Objects look bigger when they're closer. If there were a plane flying long and low above that photographer, it would look larger than the resulting Plane Shape Hole.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/hole

Nada. Instead there's the little divebombing thingie (thingies) I truly regret naming a Whatzit.
It does show perspective just fine, but it's the perspective for a much smaller object.
http://missilegate.com/blob11

I bet you're got enough clue to understand this right off.

Sunday, December 04, 2005 1:46:00 AM  
Blogger War On Suckers said...

Although much time and effort has gone into analysing the Naudet film of the first event. It is quite clear that some of that documentary was filmed elsewhere at some other time. So it is quite likely the film of the first event was also created somewhere else at some other time. That along with the fact that the www.bts.gov database (up to 18 months ago) showed flight AA11 wasn't scheduled to fly that day and that it never took off, suggests there was probably no plane to be filmed anyway. Though it may have been a Global Hawke, a cruise missile or a suicide pigeon, they had 24 hours to cut and paste a pretty convincing piece trauma inducing footage of whatever they wanted to show their sheeple.

So it could well have been a missile from the Woolworth building given the number of reports linked to from http://orbwar.com/woolworth/
However, although it is interesting, not sure if one should read too much into specks and flashed on a piece of film of the Woolworth building later that day.

Sunday, December 04, 2005 6:02:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't poison the 9/11 truth well with bullshit like 'the plane was cgi'.

Monday, July 09, 2007 6:26:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's amazing that there really are people out there who go about their day trying to make bullshit accusations out of nothing. You're a disgrace to every human being that died that day on September 11.

Sunday, July 27, 2008 3:11:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"You're a disgrace to every human being that died that day on September 11."

and also to every human being that has a brain.

looks like someone is watching too much X-filish movies here.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:56:00 PM  
Anonymous improve memory said...

The naudet film is staged for sure, and therefore false/fake.

Also, at 846AM an explosion from within the WTC, which was the start of the controlled demolition, is what caused the hole, not an aircraft of any type.

Monday, July 21, 2014 4:14:00 AM  
Anonymous valuable US coins said...

Almost 13 years later and still there are people who refuse to even consider the truth: that the government carried out the events of that day, not foreign terrorists or hijackers.

That's right, learn about Operation Northwoods and what a "false flag" operation is, and how the thoroughly evil bush & cousin cheney would stop at nothing to have an excuse for war in Iraq and also suppression of freedom with the patriot act and the TSA.

And now cousin obama to both of them continues the evil and the lies with the fake, staged killing of bin laden, who had nothing to do with it and who died of AIDS anyway in 2002.

Can't kill someone who is already dead.

Another staged film, the "killing of Bin laden. ( Notice: body or any physical evidence never produced, shown, or even photographed = more government lies).

Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:31:00 PM  
Anonymous high flying high said...

More people are questioning the government's version of 911, and that's a very good thing since it is a bunch of internal contradictions and lies.

Monday, December 29, 2014 7:54:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home